All Rights Reserved © 2004 Thomas W. Day
To explain the many stupid things done in Washington, Bush often blames "the liberals in Congress." The four-legged fools who think that Bush could identify a problem if it was pecking a hole in the top of his head repeat the chant "the liberals in Congress" as if it was actual information. You could count the liberals in Congress on the fingers of one hand. If there are that many. Many real liberals thought the one and only liberal left in Congress, Paul Wellstone, died in 2002. If John Kerry and John Edwards are examples of what passes for a congressional liberal today, then this country has a severe liberal leadership deficit.
For the last two decades, counting the number of liberals in Washington has been a grossly overrated activity. Democrats are not necessarily liberal, regardless of the ignorant and boneheaded claims of the Bushies. Those fools think anyone who isn't to the right of Adolph Hitler is a liberal. Their definition of "conservative" is so simplistic that it resembles a meaningless chant, "pro-life good, pro-choice bad." On every issue of government action, the neo-cons are radically socialist.
Remember, Nazi Germany was called The Socialist Republic of Germany. The definition of socialism is "a social system in which the means of producing and distributing goods are owned collectively and political power is exercised by the whole community." We have allowed our government to redistribute national wealth to less than 1% of the population and we have allowed a tiny number of international corporations to absorb the majority of the nation's economic activity. In our case, the production and distribution is exclusively within the means, and under the control, of a socialist elite, just like the old Soviet Union. Just like the Soviet Union's nomenclature, that elite is uninterested in the welfare of the nation, its security, or the future of its citizens. If things get bad enough, they'll move to a country they have yet to wreak. They are no more the loyal citizens of the United States than were the mobsters who destroyed the Soviet Union. Who knows, when it gets bad enough here maybe our mobsters will move to Russia?
The Bushies would like you to believe that anyone elected as a Democrat is a liberal, for the sake of their simplified, inaccurate political propaganda. The reality is that very few southern or western Democrats hold a single liberal political view. Outside of Teddy Kennedy, it's hard to find a northern Democrat who could be seriously defined as "liberal." Leiberman, Gore's running mate in 2000, is more consistently conservative than anyone in the Bush Administration. Those of you with a few functioning memory cells might remember that Gore was a good deal less than liberal, to the point that Frank Zappa suffered a trip to Washington to argue that Gore's attempt to censor music lyrics violated the First Amendment. Gore's wife, Tipper, is as radically socially conservative as any Republican.
Since the definition of conservative is someone who is limited to "traditional views and values" and tends "to oppose change," it's hard to imagine anyone who isn't conservative getting elected in the current US climate. The current voting generation of Americans is timid, unimaginative, politically ignorant, and under serious economic pressure. That is not a formula for electing people who are "not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded." That is the definition of "liberal." If you can find fault in any of those characteristics, you will be happy to be called a conservative. Most intelligent humans, especially Americans, would be happy to aspire to be liberal, knowing that it is nearly impossible for a human to consistently hold to those values.
Today's problems were created by conservatives of both parties. In fact, various flavors of conservatives are all that either party is capable of producing. Conservatives sponsored by labor unions, conservatives sponsored by corporate executives, conservatives sponsored by government employees or government agencies, or, worst of all, conservatives sponsored by religious organizations. Anyone with a lick of sense would be desperate to see a liberal find a position of power in this stagnate society. Unless we all have to suffer years of another Great Depression, I don't see it happening. We are not experiencing desperate times and without desperation humans never resort to creativity.